Friday, December 02, 2011

New Meth Research Study Results Released.

Press release from the journal Addiction on new research findings from study involving UCLA SARx researchers:

14 November 2011

A recent study has found that PROMETA™, a popular but controversial treatment for methamphetamine addiction, is no more effective than placebo in reducing methamphetamine use, keeping users in treatment, or reducing cravings for methamphetamine.  The study was funded by Hythiam, the company that owns the PROMETA™ protocol, and is published online today in the scientific journal Addiction. 

Methamphetamine, also known as meth, crystal meth, or ice, is the second most abused illicit drug in the world (cannabis is first), with 15-16 million regular users.  The United States saw a rapid growth in methamphetamine addiction in the early 2000s.  It was during that epidemic that PROMETA™ burst onto the public scene through an aggressive marketing campaign.

Since its introduction, the PROMETA™ protocol has been widely used in specialized private clinics in the U.S. as a treatment for methamphetamine addiction without going through the normal drug approval process.  Normally, introducing a new medication requires approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, including tests of product safety and a clinical trial to make sure the treatment produces the predicted effects.   A loophole in this regulatory system allows a combination of previously approved medications to be marketed without review, whether or not the individual medications were originally approved as a treatment for the condition the new protocol targets.  The manufacturer of PROMETA™, Hythiam, was therefore able to market and sell the new protocol with no federal review or clinical trial evidence. 

Private patients reportedly pay $12,000 to $15,000 for one month of treatment. 

Hythiam used some of its profits to fund the clinical trials long called for by the scientific community, including this one, designed and led by Dr. Walter Ling, a respected U.S. scientist and expert on methamphetamine addiction.  Ling and his fellow researchers found that the group of participants given the PROMETA™  treatment did not have better outcomes than those given placebo in terms of  reducing methamphetamine use, retention in treatment, or reducing methamphetamine cravings. 

For more info on this research paper visit the Addiction Journal.

If you have questions or comments-- post below, e-mail us or send a message via http://twitter.com/uclasarx! We welcome your feedback! Thanks for tuning in.



Tags: ,

1 comment:

  1. This blog is very impressive and very helpful to everyone that sees it. Thank you.
    Consumer Market Research

    ReplyDelete